Supervision: Professional Disclosure Statements


Cobia and Boes (2000) advocate the employment of both professional disclosure statements by supervisors, as well as the development of formal plans for supervision.  The intent is to minimize the potential for ethical conflicts regarding informed consent, supervisor competence, due process and supervisee competence, confidentiality, and dual relationships.  Ideally, “the strategies increase the opportunities for learning the skills necessary for professional collaboration; establish an environment conducive to open, honest communication; and promote the development of rapport and trust in the supervisory relationship.”  (Cobia & Boes, 2000, p. 293)  It has been suggested that the document contain the “supervisor’s background, methods to be used in supervision, the responsibilities and requirements of supervisors, supervisee’s responsibilities, policies pertaining to confidentiality and privacy, documentation of supervision, risk and benefits, evaluation of job performance, complaint procedures and due process, professional development goals, and duration and termination of the supervision contract.”  (Corey, Schneider-Corey, & Callanan, 2007, p. 367-368)

In my view, the ideal supervisory relationship is much like the ideal therapeutic alliance between a counselor and a counselee… it is a bi-lateral relationship based on trust and mutual respect.  The professional disclosure statement effectively sets the expectations, as well as defines the mutual rights and responsibilities of the parties involved.  The supervisee stands to benefit by making an informed choice regarding a supervisor, perhaps leading to a more fulfilling and professional growth oriented experience.  The supervisor themselves benefit most by the limitation of potential liability.  Risk management, on the part of the supervisor, is integral in the process of developing a professional disclosure statement.

In any event, I agree with the authors that “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” despite the fact that even the most diligently planned supervisory relationship will not be sufficient to prevent all of the potential ethical dilemmas.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

References

Cobia, D. C., & Boes, S. R. (2000, Summer). Professional disclosure statements and formal plans for supervision: Two strategies for minimizing the risk of ethical conflicts in post-master’s supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development : JCD, 78(3), 293-296. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.bellevue.edu:80/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.bellevue.edu/pqdweb?did=56614181&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=4683&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Corey, G., Schneider-Corey, M., & Callanan, P. (2007). Issues and ethics in the helping professions (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s